Sunday, June 21, 2009

Why You Want to Bring Me Down?

Funny People, a comedy-drama starring Adam Sandler, is scheduled to be released next month. The story involves a popular comedian who learns he's dying from a blood disease. The trailer shows shows a number of sentimental scenes with crying, hugging, and crying while hugging.

This may be a good time to talk about comedians blending comedy and drama in films. It may be a good time to explore the long and bumpy road that many comedians have taken in pursuit of pathos.

The Kid (1921) was the prototype for the comedy pathos film. Chaplin finds an infant abandoned beside garbage cans. He claims the baby and raises him as his own. Chaplin is a loving and responsible caretaker to the child (Jackie Coogan). He deals the best he can with this disturbing situation presented to him. The film's eventual crisis, that of the welfare workers taking Coogan away from Chaplin, comes out of the cruelty of welfare workers and nothing that Chaplin has done wrong. He cannot be faulted in any way for his predicament. Circumstances have arisen that are beyond his control. The world, after all, can be unfair.

Harold Lloyd developed an alternate model for the pathos film in which the hero does in fact contribute to his predicament, either due to a personality flaw, a wrong action or a mistaken idea. It is necessary, before he can get himself out of the predicament, for him to learn a lesson and make himself a better person. Lloyd, at various times, had to overcome shyness, acquire courage, cure himself of hypochondria, learn to be himself, and learn that brains can be more effective than brawn. Lloyd said that, in his films, he "got himself into difficulties and had trouble getting out but finally rose above it, surmounting the whole thing and came out well in the end." Lloyd, in the words of Annette D'Agostino Lloyd, liked for his character to demonstrate "resourcefulness in a pinch." On screen, as in life, he believed that success in life was dependent more on hard work and enthusiasm than luck. Unlike Chaplin, he didn't see the world being controlled by a cruel fate.

Chaplin races across rooftops in pursuit of the orphanage van. He drops down on top of the van and breaks into the back doors to recover Coogan. This is the sort of action that Harold Lloyd took at the climax of his films. But, while Lloyd emerged victorious by taking action, Chaplin is only able to hold onto Coogan temporarily.

Adam Sandler entered pathos territory before Funny People. It would be hard to find a scene darker or more tearful than Sandler's death scene in Click (2006). Also, the comedian showed a softer side in Big Daddy (1999). Compare Chaplin's situation in The Kid with Adam Sandler's situation in Big Daddy. Sandler, like Chaplin, adopts a small boy abandoned by his mother. He, too, has bonded with the child only to have welfare authorities take the child away from him. This makes the film resemble The Kid. But other elements of the film make it more like Harold Lloyd's The Freshman. Sandler adopts the child to fool his ex-girlfriend into thinking that he can be responsible. He contrives this situation with selfish and deceptive motives. But, then, having to take care of a child does in fact make him more caring and responsible. His character, like Harold Lloyd's character in The Freshman, must undergo improvement and ultimately win over the crowd in a rousing climax. The crowd in The Freshman is spectators packed into a football stadium and the crowd in Big Daddy is the spectators packed into a courtroom.

In the end, Big Daddy failed at pathos. Peter Rainer, critic for New York Magazine, wrote, "Sandler being Chaplinesque isn't pretty." The film earned Sandler the Razzie Award for Worst Actor of the Year.

Sandler was not the first to try to fill Chaplin's shoes.


In The Clown (1953), Red Skelton plays a down-and-out comedian battling alcoholism while trying to care for his young son Dink. Skelton manages to stage a successful comeback with the support of his son but he feels faint as he comes off stage and he collapses before he can reach his dressing room. After he is laid down on a couch, he regains consciousness and looks up lovingly at his son. He asks his son if he was proud seeing how well he did on stage. Dink tells him that he has always been proud of him. Skelton tells Dink that he is a good boy and then dies. Dink's estranged mother comes in the door right on cue and the boy goes running into her arms. Dink's mother has a lot in common with The Kid's mother. She gave up her baby because she wasn't fit to care for him, but now she comes back into his life as a wealthy woman and offers the child luxury and security. It is questionable if Chaplin will be able to find a place in The Kid's fancy new life, but Skelton made it easy in his case by having the good manners to die.

The Kid was the obvious model for Gigot (1962), a pet project of Jackie Gleason. Gleason got a great deal of pathos out of The Honeymooners' Ralph Kramden, but Gleason and his writers never had an outright plan for Kramden to generate pathos. Gleason just wanted the character to be a realistic representation of people he knew while growing up in Brooklyn. Pathos was something that developed naturally out of Kramden. Kramden showed how sad it was to be fat, poor and dumb. But Gigot, besides being fat, poor and dumb, is mute. He also had neighbors constantly making him the butt of practical jokes. It seemed that, when it came to this film, Gleason was pouring on the suffering a bit thick.

Lou Costello tried his hand twice at pathos, first the Harold Lloyd way and then the Chaplin way. The premise of Little Giant (1946) is similar to the premise of The Freshman. Costello, a rookie vacuum cleaner salesman, is crushed to learn that his new co-workers have made him the butt of a practical joke. He is about to walk into an awards ceremony when he finds his co-workers laughing about him. This isn't much different than the scene in The Freshman where Lloyd stands outside of a party and sees his fellow students laughing about him. Costello's version of The Kid is Dance with Me, Henry (1956). Costello is trying to gain custody of two orphans, but a mean welfare worker is doubtful that Costello is able to provide a suitable environment for them. When Costello gets implicated in a murder, the welfare worker removes the children from his home. Costello shows he has the talent to handle dramatic material, but Little Giant and Dance with Me, Henry provide the actor with weak material. Dance with Me, Henry is mildly amusing at best. Little Giant is unwatchable.

The Three Stooges attempted pathos in Cash and Carry (1937). The Stooges arrive at their home, a dilapidated shack in the city dump, only to find a little boy they don't know doing his homework at the kitchen table. The Stooges do not react with great sentiment to this child. Larry pipes up, "Come on, beat it." But, then, they realize that the boy is wearing a leg brace and needs the support of a crutch to stand and walk. The boy tells the Stooges that his mom and dad are gone and he's being raised by his big sister. Moe, normally gruff and scowling, smiles sympathetically and softens his voice. He has never acted more tenderly to another individual. But the other two Stooges do not show much concern. Larry, though having had his "Get off my lawn" Gran Torino moment, hangs out in the background for the remainder of the scene. Curly pretty much acts like Curly. For the most part, the Three Stooges show no great commitment in they way they treat the pathos of this scene. To them, it must have been just another genre. Seconds after meeting the crippled orphan boy, Curly accidentally hits Moe in the head with a pipe and it's back to their usual comedy business. A pathos comedy was, in the end, no more significant to the Stooges than a haunted house comedy.

Jerry Lewis gave pathos a bad name. Lewis got involved with pathos while he was still working with Dean Martin. The earliest examples of Lewis pathos can be found in The Stooge (1952) and The Caddy (1953). The Martin & Lewis films often had a dramatic scene where Martin would lash out at Lewis and tell him to get out of his life. The particular nature of their relationship made it seem like a father rejecting a helpless child and making his best effort to abandon him. Lewis always looked devastated. As a child, I was disturbed by Martin's hostility towards Lewis. Abbott's abuse of Costello was pure absurdity. Moe smacking Curly in the head with a wrench was too far-fetched to be believed. But Martin's hostility towards Lewis seemed all too real.

Pathos was at a maximum in Lewis' first solo film, The Delicate Delinquent (1957). Lewis, in the title role, plays a troubled teenager in a crime-ridden urban neighborhood. No one seems concerned that casting the 30-year-old comedian as a teenager would strain the credibility of the film. A gang of juvenile delinquents give Lewis a switchblade and demand that he use it to rob a well-dressed woman coming down the alley. Before he demands that the woman turn over her valuables, Lewis wants to make sure that he looks tough and he also wants to show the woman he knows how to handle a switchblade. The scene gives Lewis an opportunity to act foolish. At one point, he lapses into a Bogart impersonation. It would make sense for Lewis to imitate James Dean or Marlon Brando, both of whom had played juvenile delinquents during this period, but Bogart's tough guy acts seems misplaced in this situation.

Lewis fails dismally in this film to integrate comedy and drama. He brings the comedy to a screeching halt whenever he wants to let some pathos lumber through. A scene, no matter how anguished, should not cause the comedy to stop. Take for example the big dramatic scene in The Kid. The welfare workers are taking Coogan away from Chaplin. Even in the midst of this emotionally wrenching scene, Chaplin supplies slapstick in the form of Coogan grabbing a sledgehammer and repeatedly bonking the welfare workers on their heads.

In Below Zero (1930), Laurel & Hardy are impoverished street musicians struggling through a bitterly cold winter. As sad as their situation is, it doesn't mean that the comedy has to stop. Hardy gets hit in the face with a snowball. A large woman smashes a bass violin over his head. But comedy seemed less of a priority in Laurel & Hardy's Air Raid Wardens (1943). The duo is featured in the comedy as patriotic Americans who want to contribute to the war effort but are rejected when they attempt to enlist in the various armed services. "Uncle Sam doesn't want us," says Stan. The boys volunteer as air raid wardens but they are fired for wreaking havoc during a late-night drill. Good pathos is heartbreaking. Bad pathos is cringe-inducing. This is bad pathos. Laurel & Hardy's many failures, which are normally funny, are only depressing in this context. These scenes transform the duo from purveyors of comedy to objects of pity.

In The Delicate Delinquent, Lewis is wild and funny going up against a sumo wrestler in a self-defense class. But, minutes later, he has a highly dramatic scene with Darren McGavin. Lewis acts in the scene as if he is desperate for the audience to feel sorry for him. It is jarring to see Lewis go from his monkey face to his serious face. But this is how Lewis would handle pathos for the rest of his career.











































The central character of a pathos comedy is, in either case, a victim. Chaplin is a victim of cruel welfare workers and Lloyd is a victim of cruel classmates. Lewis turned himself into an advocate for the world's victims. This led him to do a lot of moralizing in his films. Lewis liked to hammer home a message about the importance of believing in yourself, or the importance of kindness, or the importance of a person learning to like themselves before expecting other people to like them. More than a hint of vanity comes through in these showy and self-righteous performances.

Lewis enters The Kid territory in The Family Jewels (1965). Except the film has one big difference that is obvious at the outset. The ten-year-old orphan girl (Donna Butterworth) is a heir to a great fortune. She lives in a mansion rather than tenement housing. Lewis, opting for a silly ending, dons a ridiculous disguise to trick authorities into granting him gain custody of the girl. The film, in all its wackiness, creates no real dramatic tension or sympathy.

In 1972, Lewis tried to outdo The Kid with The Day the Clown Cried, which featured the comedian as a washed up circus clown who befriends a group of children imprisoned in a Nazi camp. Chaplin was the caretaker of one displaced child. Lewis is now the caretaker of dozens of displaced children. Even more, Lewis has managed to transform Chaplin's tenement into a concentration camp and replace the cold-hearted welfare workers with genocidal Nazis.

A filmmaker is messing with a volatile formula when he tries mixing comedy and drama. He has to get it just right or else the whole thing will blow up in his face. It offends people when a comedian seems to be showing off and trying to prove how dramatic he can be. It irritates people when the sad scenes in a comedy come across as forced, contrived and excessive. It doesn't win fans to have sad scenes in a comedy turn mawkish or maudlin. That's when critics complain that about a comedy having gooey sentiment, turgid sentiment, heavy-handed sentiment, cloying sentiment, or mushy sentiment. It is a mistake when a film is rigged for pathos scenes as a way to manipulate audiences.

Even as a child, growing up in the sixties, I knew good pathos from bad. Pathos was sprinkled into Don Knott's films in the sixties. Knotts was a skillful enough as an actor to move smoothly between pathos and goofiness. Still, pathos and Vic Mizzy music did not go well together. The one comedy that really moved me during this period was Popi (1969), which totally flipped the premise of The Kid. Alan Arkin, as Popi, comes up with an outrageous scheme to get welfare authorities to take his children. He is desperate to get his two small boys out of the slums and he figures that, if he sets them adrift in a rowboat off the coast of Miami, he can trick the Coast Guard into thinking they are Cuban refugees and draw publicity to get a rich family to adopt them. Arkin is a rare actor who can make me laugh and cry at the same time. It's forty years later and he's still doing it for me. I had this reaction to Arkin just last month seeing him in Sunshine Cleaners.

It is the job of a filmmaker to create characters and tell a story. A character may find himself in situation that evokes pathos. Fine, people in the audience may feel sad and they may even shed a tear. The audience will recognize the pathos if it's there and allowed to come out on its own. Compassion should grow naturally out of the characters and situations.

One of the best moments of pathos in a comedy comes in It's A Gift (1934). Grocer W.C. Fields has a dream of moving his family to California and becoming the proprietor of an orange grove. He finally gets his wish when he inherits enough money to buy an orange grove for sale. The family arrives at their new property, which is barren and rundown. Fields' son finds an orange growing on a bush but its a pathetically puny specimen. Fields is about to toss away the orange in disgust but he suddenly decides to take a second look at it and this causes him to have a change of heart. It may not be much of an orange but its still an orange. His expression softens and he sticks the orange into his pocket. His wife grabs their children and takes off on him. He calls out to her, offering to drive her to wherever it is she wants to go, but she ignores him and keeps on walking. Fields sits down to contemplate his situation. The family dog, who has not been one to desert him, comes to his side and licks his face. The scene is real to life and it evolves naturally out of the story. Fields plays the scene perfectly. He does very little and yet he conveys just how devastated his character must feel at having had his dream shattered.

A truly Chaplinesque comedy is Bread and Chocolate, a 1973 Italian film starring Nino Manfredi. Manfredi gives a heartfelt performance as Nino, a poor, luckless Italian immigrant struggling through a series of demeaning jobs in Switzerland. The film starts out light and funny but the series of misadventures have an effect on the character. This character isn't the type of a shallow, persistent buffoon like Mr. Bean, who remains unaffected as he bounces from one disaster to another. He fights hard not to give up and keep up his spirits. He is able, for much of the film, to maintain a sense of humor and a friendly attitude. Eventually, though, he becomes frustrated, angry and discouraged. His situation has grown increasingly hopeless in Switzerland and, yet, he has nothing to go back to in Italy. He is unhappy with his home country, where no jobs are available, and he is unhappy with his adopted country, where he is treated so badly. He becomes trapped between these two countries. Repeatedly, he boards a train to return to Italy, only make a last-minute scramble for the exit. In desperation, he tries to be accepted as Swiss by dyeing his hair blond, but he becomes disgusted seeing his reflection in a mirror and smashes his head through the mirror. It seems in the final scene that he has finally resigned to go home. He boards the train, which quickly pulls out of the station. But, then, the train disappears into a tunnel and we suddenly hear the screech of the emergency brake. In the final shot of the film, Nino trudges out of the tunnel. He stops and stares into the camera, as if expecting someone in the audience to tell him where to go and what to do.

Bread and Chocolate is not about self-improvement, which is what Lloyd's films were about. Nino is working as hard as he can and it isn't getting him anywhere. He tries to "improve" himself by dyeing his hair, but he finds himself unwilling to pretend he's something he isn't. This film, like Chaplin's films, provides a commentary on the social conditions that trap people. It is, in this way, comparable to another poignant comedy of the period, The Prisoner of Second Avenue (1975). Mel Edison (Jack Lemmon) is the "prisoner" of the story. Edison is a character that a modern American audience should be able to understand. He is not a tramp or an immigrant laborer. He is a middle-aged business executive who has just lost his job and, due to social problems like unemployment, labor strikes and crime, finds himself slipping towards a nervous breakdown.

Funny People promises to be different than The Kid or The Freshman in that the central character is being threatened by an impersonal agency: disease. This brings up Lloyd Hamilton. Hamilton was unique in that he was plagued more by natural forces than he was by people. Harry Langdon was said to have been an innocent protected by God. Frank Capra talked about Langdon escaping a cop because a loose brick just happens to fall at the right time and the right place to knock the policeman unconscious. Harry's triumph is, in the end, due to divine intervention. Hamilton, on the other hand, has a never ending war with all God's creatures great and small. And, when he isn't being chased by a lion or trying to get a squirrel out of his pants, he is being harassed by wind, rain and snow. It is as if this poor fellow has a quarrel with God.

For all the animosity that Lewis drew for his attempts at pathos, no pathos comedy was ever loathed more by critics than the Robin Williams vehicle Patch Adams (1998). This film had it all, from a self-righteous character moralizing to everyone to a gang of sick children showing up to evoke pity. Stephen Hunter, a critic with the Washington Post, wrote, "There should be a special room in Hell where the makers of films like Patch Adams are sent. There they will be force-fed treacle through a funnel and made to endure lectures from the morally superior. . . Indeed, there's such a subtext of preening narcissism, of vanity exploded out to the horizon, that Patch Adams becomes hard to bear. . . It's about altruism as a form of psychosis." Roger Ebert, critic with the Chicago Sun-Times, wrote, "[Patch Adams] made me want to spray the screen with Lysol. This movie is shameless. It's not merely a tearjerker. It extracts tears individually by liposuction, without anesthesia." Dennis Lim, critic with the Village Voice, wrote, "a buffoonish, scarily maniacal bedside manner, which, far from being salubrious, is more likely to trigger relapses and lawsuits. . . Patch regains his composure in time for a climactic tantrum before a medical review board, after which. . . sick children file in for a weepy encore. It's an unforgettable image, stunning in its crassness, and a fitting coda for the year's most repugnant movie." It wasn't The Day the Clown Cried but it came fairly close.











Keaton was one comedian who thought it best to stay away from pathos. In general, the Great Stoneface shunned overblown emotions. Harold Lloyd was warm and lively in scenes with his leading ladies, particularly Jobyna Ralston. But Keaton did not have that same warmth and liveliness with his leading ladies. In Sherlock, Jr., he is tense and awkward when he goes to see his girlfriend, Kathryn McGuire. This is especially odd considering that Keaton has come to propose marriage. The couple go through a comically mechanical routine just to hold hands.

The film's villain, Ward Crane, steals a watch belonging to McGuire's father and later plants a pawn ticket for the stolen watch in Keaton's pocket. When the pawn ticket is discovered in his pocket, Keaton is unable to offer an explanation and he is asked to leave the house. A close-up shows the reaction of the girlfriend. A close-up shows the reaction of the girlfriend's father. But Keaton's reaction is shown in a longshot. The camera is too far away to see if Keaton's eyes are welling up with tears, too far away to show if his lip is quivering, too far away to show if his brow is wrinkling. The shot could have only been set farther back if Keaton could have gotten his hands on the Hubble telescope at the time.

McGuire breaks up with Keaton and gives him back his engagement ring. A scene where the hero is rebuffed by his girlfriend would normally display the actors tightly in the frame and feature reaction shots of both characters. However, Keaton's reaction is again shown in a long shot.

Keaton acts dejected standing on the front porch. But he is not one to stay down for long and, far from wallowing in pity, he soon speeds off to tail Crane and get the goods on this shifty character. You go, Buster. I dedicate this video to you.

The Checkered Cap Memorial Club


Lloyd Hamilton left a lasting impression on his directors, who spoke fondly of the comedian long after his death. The evidence suggests that these directors missed Hamilton so badly that they dressed up other comedians to look like him. Look, I don't mean for it to sound bizarre and creepy like Jimmy Stewart dressing up Kim Novak to look like his deceased lover in Vertigo.   In romantic relationships, it is called obsession.  In filmmaking, it is called homage.

Less than a year after Hamilton's death, Hamilton's former partner Jack White dressed Curly Howard in Hamilton's cap and tie for Three Stooges comedies, including Ants in the Pantry and Half-Shot Shooters. Jack's brother Jules, who had also worked with Hamilton, continued to dress up Curly like Hamilton in later comedies (including Three Smart Saps, which is pictured below).

Curly reenacted a number of Hamilton gags in comedies directed by the White Brothers.  A popular routine in which Hamilton battled a squirting duck was repeated by Curly in A Ducking They Did Go (1939).

Curly inherited even more of Hamilton's material from Harry Edwards, another former Hamilton director. An example is a scene in Some More of Samoa (1941) in which Curly wins an island chief's regalia in a game of craps.  Hamilton had originally performed this routine in Robinson Crusoe Ltd. (1921). Although this film is missing, a visual record survives as part of the magazine ad shown below (courtesy of Steve Massa).















Norman Taurog, who wrote and directed Hamilton's series from 1925 to 1928, featured Jerry Lewis in a checkered cap in The Stooge (1953). Lewis, playing a vaudeville comic, adopts the checkered cap and a matching jacket as his trademark outfit. Hamilton was too old for Lewis to have remembered him. By the time Lewis was old enough to be going to the movies, Hamilton was well past his prime and the silent comedies that had made him famous were no longer in circulation. Yet, Lewis talked about Hamilton during an interview he gave to Sheilah Graham in 1956, at which time he was working with Taurog on Pardners. He praised Hamilton as a "studied comedian" and ranked him as one of the top ten comics. It seems likely that Lewis had learned about Hamilton from talking to Taurog. Lewis' boyish, eager-to-please character, largely created under the guidance of Taurog, probably owes at least a slight debt to Hamilton's boyish, eager-to-please character.

William Beaudine, the director of "Ham" comedies and Hamilton's Self-Made Failure feature, outfitted Huntz Hall in a checkered cap and flowing Windsor tie in the Bowery Boys comedy Blues Busters (1950). Hall deviates from his normal characterization. Hall's character, Sach Jones, was a goofy, cloddish bungler lacking in emotional depth. Leo Gorcey would react to his foul ups by smacking him with his hat, which would prompt Hall to recoil and make a funny face. It's different in this film. When Hall messes up and gets yelled at by Gorcey, he becomes distressed and walks off forlornly. He goes as far as packing his bags to leave. These actions are more in line with the sensitive, sad sack character that Hamilton portrayed on screen.

Perched on the heads of these men, the checkered cap stood as a monument to the original funnyman in a checkered cap - Lloyd Hamilton.

Keaton Rides Again!

Buster Keaton lives on in the hearts and minds of filmmakers.

This year, Keaton made an appearance on NBC's Heroes. Hiro and Ando, a pair of Japanese heroes, pursue a Haitian bad guy into a French theater to watch an American comedy. Wow, multiculturalism gives me a headache. Keaton's Cops is playing on the screen when they first enter the theater.

But the film on screen changes abruptly as the scene progresses. If you look below, you can now see the climax of Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928) visible over the shoulders of actor Jimmy Jean-Louis. Keaton, blown through the street by a cyclone, tumbles across the screen.

Keaton's influence has been seen this year on the big screen.

First, his name came up in reviews for WALL-E. Jeffrey Westhoff, a critic with the Northwest Herald, wrote "[I]magine Buster Keaton as a small box with binoculars for eyes and tank treads for legs. . . WALL-E is the finest Buster Keaton film in 80 years." Katrina Onstad, a New York Times critic, wrote, "WALL-E feels almost like a silent film. The first 25 to 30 minutes introduce WALL-E as a Buster Keaton-meets-E.T. figure, comically rocking and shuffling." Mary Wehring, critic at the Cary News, wrote, "WALL-E is an animated Buster Keaton — running into walls and knocking himself over because he’s so distracted by a girl."

Andrew Stanton, the director of WALL-E, confirmed that Keaton was a major influence on his robot hero. "Oh, he's definitely Keaton, in my mind," said Stanton. The director explained that WALL-E's binocular eyes were designed to give the robot ''a Buster Keaton, stone-face, sad-eyes quality." Stanton explained that he immersed his crew in the work of Keaton and Chaplin. "We looked at everything those guys did," said Stanton. "We watched a Chaplin film and one of Keaton's at lunch every day for almost a year until we saw their entire body of work. We walked away thinking there's almost no emotion you can't convey visually. It gave us the courage to take a risk to get it across: If those guys did it, we could too. . . [I]n terms of humor, of how much you can convey with very little, we definitely pulled from Keaton's playbook. He was the Great Stone Face - his expression never changed very much, and neither does WALL-E's."

Critics have also identified Keaton's influence on O'Horten, a recent comedy from Norwegian filmmaker Bent Hamer. O'Horten, according to Boston Globe critic Ty Burr, is "a precise, deadpan drama of slapstick existentialism." Lisa Schwarzbaum, in her review for Entertainment Weekly, referred to star Baard Owe as "Buster Keaton-ish." Alissa Simon, a critic for Variety, wrote, "Owe is Buster Keaton-like perfection." Walter Addiego, critic for the San Francisco Chronicle, wrote, "[Owe]'s taciturn. . . and has a bit of a Buster Keaton air." Nick Roddick, critic for the Evening Standard, wrote, "[T]he ghost of Buster Keaton is probably among those chuckling." Peter Rainer, critic for the Christian Science Monitor, referred to "Horten's blankly expressive, Buster Keaton-like face." Milos Stehlik, critic for Chicago Public Radio, wrote, "O’Horten also harks back to comic anti-heroes like Jacques Tati’s M. Hulot or Buster Keaton." Lou Lumenick, critic for the New York Post, wrote that Bard Owe gives a brilliant performance "that Buster Keaton would be proud to call his own."

As the film begins, Odd Horten is preparing to retire after forty years as a locomotive engineer. Burr points out that the film's opening scenes show Horten's train traveling in a perfectly straight line "as it cuts through. . . glowing white snowfields." This is a beautiful, orderly world. As an engineer, Horten lived by a timetable and traveled on tracks that never let him veer off course. Burr wrote,"O'Horten is what happens to this man when he retires and the strangeness of life finally comes rushing in." Schwarzbaum noted that the film is about the retired engineer "learn[ing] to live life without a timetable."

It is a low-key film that progresses at a relaxed pace. Burr wrote, "Only at the end do we understand the vast emotional terrain traveled." In early scenes, Horten is shown performing routine tasks, which helps you to understand the mundaneness of his life. A scene showing Horten filling a water cup in a bird cage is not something you would see in an American film unless the bird were to bite the man's finger or fly out of the cage and shit on the man's shoulder.

A series of problems begin for Horten when he gets locked out of the building where his friends are gathered for his retirement party. He climbs up a scaffolding and through a window but he encounters a little boy having trouble falling asleep and he agrees to sit at the boy's bedside until he dozes off. Horten himself falls asleep, which causes him to miss the party.

Horten encounters a number of men and women long retired from the world. Early on, he visits a nursing home to see his mother, who is in a catatonic state. Horten is clearly troubled to see the woman this way. Later, Horten sees an old man enter a smoke shop acting confused and almost desperate. The man asks the shopkeeper if he bought matches from her earlier. He seems to have a vague recollection of the purchase but he cannot find what he did with the matches. The woman gives him another box of matches and then helps him to the door. We can see the man through the window in the store front. He no sooner leaves the store then he falls down on the sidewalk. This is something that the audience can see, but it goes unnoticed by Horten and the shopkeeper. The old man eventually picks himself up and returns inside the shop asking again if he had bought matches. Horten closely observes this old man who has trouble remembering things or staying on his feet. Critic Walter Addiego says that this "series of mildly absurd events and adventures. . . hint at how his remaining days may turn out."


Soon after, Horten helps another old man who has collapsed in the street. The old man introduces himself as Trygve Sissener. He says that he is a retired diplomat. Horten takes it upon himself to escort the friendly old gentleman home. Sissener arrives home to find that he forget to shut off his refrigerator's ice dispenser, which has spilled enough ice on the kitchen floor to sink the Titanic. Again, Horten is served with a reminder as to how unreliable the mind becomes in old age.

Sissener picks up a rock he has sitting inside his liquor cabinet and tells Horten that this is a meteor rock 4.3 billion years old. He explains that the rock started its journey before the Earth was even born. Horten quips that the rock traveled all those years just to end its journey in a liquor cabinet. It is the one time in the film that he smiles, albeit it is a slight smile. Sissener insists that the journey of the old rock has not ended. It is an obvious, yet effective metaphor for Horten.

Sissener tells Horten that, years ago, he discovered that he could see with his eyes closed and he was able to drive through city streets without looking at the road. He invites Horten to come with him for a drive in the morning and he will show him that he is able to do this. The men realize that this is something daring that they are about to do, but they believe that this adventure will be worth the risk. This sets into motion the final act of the film.

Horten's preoccupation with trains certainly links him to Keaton. The character particularly resembles Keaton when he gets lost on an airport tarmac. He stands stiffly, this lone figure in the middle of a great, barren expanse.

I have written a futuristic novel, Slaughterhouse Frome, in which a planet has been named after Keaton. The planet has an amusement park based on Keaton's films. Geneticists on the planet initiate a project to clone Keaton but the clone, while a mechanical genius, fails to demonstrate a sense of humor. I am beginning to wonder, given this growing adoration of Keaton, if the idea of a Keaton amusement park isn't too far-fetched.

Keaton, as a comedy icon, has become embedded in our culture. He is sure to influence filmmakers for generations to come.


Funny Fantasties

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (2009) is undeniably an entertaining film, but it is hard for me to call it a comedy. The movie, pretty much a long stream of wild and far-out special effects occasionally interrupted by a wisecrack, is more fun than funny. I was won over by the special effects as soon as I saw a T-Rex skeleton hopping around and wagging its tail like a puppy.

Films like this can seem bloated and chaotic but this film moves along briskly and smoothly. The simple idea of a museum coming to life provides the filmmakers with a reliable premise. Other artifacts that come to life include a purplish octopus, Rodin's Thinker, Darth Vader, and the Lincoln Memorial. This time, it isn't only museum artifacts and exhibits that come to life. Even items in the gift shop come to life. A highlight of the film is a scene featuring a silly gaggle of Einstein bobble heads. The most eye-catching scene features Ben Stiller and Amy Adams jumping into Alfred Eisenstaedt's "The Kiss" photo. Suddenly, the actors are in a black & white recreation of World War II-era Times Square.

I could have done without the politically correct lectures about Earhart's importance to the women's movement. If the filmmakers truly had respect for Earhart, they wouldn't have turned her into what critic Lael Loewenstein described as "a flame-haired screwball-comedy heroine." The idea of casting Amy Adams as Earhart is somewhat like casting Megan Fox as Marjorie Main. Still, it isn't only about casting. Earhart falling head over heels for Stiller, who she has just met, makes the female aviator seem, well, flighty. On the matter of Adams, let us get to the elephant in the room. The actress' skin-tight flight pants borders on the obscene. It seemed like, instead of honoring Earhart, Adams is providing her own personal homage to the gluteus maximus. She is showing off so much crack that visitors to the Constitution Gardens could easily mistake her for The Liberty Bell.

Of course, it's not enough to raise up women if, at the same time, you don't take the opportunity to diminish men. This is the reason that the Wright Brothers are portrayed as dimwitted sexists who freak out seeing a woman flying a plane. If that wasn't enough, the Tuskegee Airmen show up just long enough to remind everyone that they broke through the color barrier as the first black American army pilots. I came to this movie for jokes, but instead I got white man's guilt.

You should not go to this film expecting a storyline or character development. The plot has to do with Stiller having to find his moxie. Oh, yes, the old moxie crisis. It's like Billy Crystal having to "find his smile again" in City Slickers. As part of finding his moxie, he also has to learn to turn off his cell phone and take time to enjoy life. Please, you arty Hollywood types, I do not go to a summer movie to have you blow my mind with your heavy themes.

Comedian Will Ferrell headlines another new special effects-driven profundity, Land of the Lost. Critic Richard Corliss believes that the screen persona perfected by Ferrell is, basically, an overage child who never had a proper role model and thinks that, to act like a man, he should rely on the way he has seen Clint Eastwood and Harrison Ford act in movies. Corliss wrote, "Endless setbacks and critiques have not dented Ferrell man's lunatic belief in himself. He strides manfully forward, his eye on the horizon — thus never noticing the open manhole he's about to step into." He describes Ferrell's latest character, Dr. Rick Marshall, as possessing "unwarranted self-assurance" and a "blindness to his crippling dooficity."

I usually find Ferrell funny, but his overage child act didn't work for me this time. Land of the Lost was, when all is said and done, shockingly bad. You have a problem when Matt Lauer is the funniest person in your movie. At one point, I had to remind myself that these pointless and incoherent images before my eyes were part of a movie and not horrible visions I was having because the hot dog I just ate had given me Mad Cow disease.

The action gets started when Ferrell, Danny McBride and Anna Friel set out in a row boat to investigate some scientic phenomena. Suddenly, the group gets sucked into a rift in time and space and end up in a time-jumbled dimension. The dimension-hoppers soon encounter a caveboy, Cha-Ka (Jorma Taccone). They get the idea that Cha-Ka will be a reliable guide even though he only shows interest in grabbing Friel's boobs.

The one funny segment in the film features Ferrell, McBride and Taccone arriving at a motel half buried in the middle of a Dalíesque desert and taking a dip in the motel's pool while Rare Earth's "I Just Want to Celebrate" plays on the soundtrack. Soon, they discover a red, bulbous plant, the potent juice which has a narcotic effect. The plot continues with Friel investigating readings on Dr. Marshall's Tachyon device while the fellas take time off to chill. Jimi Hendrix's ominous "All Along the Watchtower" plays as McBride, who has become paranoid from guzzling the plant juice, questions Cha-Ka to make sure that he isn't a narc. The trio are in such a stupor that all they can do is lay around and giggle at one another. Ferrell is suddenly wearing a bandanna around his head. In the background, a float in the shape of a yellow duck glides across the water. The scene is silly and surreal. The boys can't even get up when they see a giant lobster skittering across the sand to attack them. Fortunately, the crab falls into a geyser and gets cooked. The men feast on the crab as night falls. The next morning, the sun rises to the melodious strains of Seals & Crofts "Summer Breeze." The camera pans over to Ferrell, McBride and Taccone, who are huddled together sleeping.

This extended music video montage is made even stranger by the fact that it occurs late in the film, at the time that the film is building to a climax. You know the plot is meaningless when the film gets to this point and the hero's only desire is to get high, eat crab meat, and spoon with his buddies. Where is Friel? Will they find their way back home? Ferrell doesn't care and I see no reason why I should care either. The rift in time and space that could get them home could be Amy Adams' butt crack and it would not have mattered to me at this point.

Baby, Take a Bow

These are the opening credits to W.C. Fields' It's a Gift.

The closing credits are limited to a single title card.


These credits are actually more extensive than most were at the time. Most films wouldn't have let the audience know that Spencer Charters played the gate guard.

Compare this to the credits in a recent episode of NBC's Heroes.

Individual credits have to be provided for fifteen cast members. Other individual credits are displayed on screen for an editor, a production designer, a director of photography, a music composer, two producers, two co-producers, four executive producers, five co-executive producers, and three consulting producers. Everyone has to get an individual credit on screen. Hollywood has no unsung artists - everyone has to be sung. In this particular episode of Heroes, thirty-six credit titles are spread out through the span of three scenes. The credits roll persistently while the action introduces important plot points and dramatic moments.

I concede that the master painters started the tradition of artists signing their work. But, for the record, most painters left their work unsigned for fear a signature would detract from the painting. Even when the paintings were signed, the signature was kept as small as possible and confined to an inconspicuous corner of the painting. Leonardo da Vinci didn't sign his name in big block letters across Mona Lisa's chest. You want to see Rembrandt's signature on a painting? There it is, get out a magnifying glass or you might miss it.

Vanity, thy name is Hollywood.

This blog entry was written by, directed by and produced by Anthony Balducci.

The Ties that Bind Us

Harold Lloyd had worn a flowing Windsor tie much like Hamilton's tie when he first created his Glass Character, but he made a point to discard the tie as he worked to refine the way his character looked. Lloyd had the idea of making his character look like an ordinary young man and the tie, in his estimation, "leaned a little towards the comic."

This tie does look silly, like something a clown would be expected to wear, but this type of tie was in fact something very distinguished gentlemen wore in the Victorian era. Hamilton, who said he dressed his character to look like a "shabby gentleman," may have taken into consideration the tie's history as high fashion when he adopted it as part of his comic costume.